AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Metabase 30m insight4/9/2023 ![]() Those with the full mutation had a greater incidence of hand-flapping, eye contact problems, special education help for reading and math, and grade retention. J.Ī study investigated phenotypic effects seen in 114 females with premutation and 41 females (ages 18-58) with full Fragile X mental retardation gene mutation. Phenotypic Involvement in Females with the FMR1 Gene Mutation.ĮRIC Educational Resources Information Center Conclusion These results further our understanding of sexual selection because they We found a strong negative genetic correlation between female choosiness and male attractiveness, a result that suggests a potentially important role for sexually antagonistic alleles in sexual selection processes in our population. Although previous research predicts a trade-off between egg size and fecundity, this was not evident in our results. Female genetic identity and the interaction between male and female genetic identity accounted for a substantial amount of the observed phenotypic variation in egg size. Furthermore we found that phenotypic variation in copulation duration had a significant male-associated genetic component. Results We found significant additive genetic variation contributing to mating speed that can be attributed to male genetic identity, female genetic identity, but not their interaction. Using this approach, we were able to quantify the genetic contribution of each mate to the observed phenotypic variation in biologically important traits including mating speed, copulation duration, and subsequent offspring production, as well as measure the magnitude and direction of intersexual genetic correlation between female choosiness and male attractiveness. We used cytogenetic cloning techniques developed for Drosophila melanogaster to create “hemiclonal†males and females with whom we directly observed sexual interaction between individuals of different known genetic backgrounds and measured subsequent reproductive outcomes. While the origins and effects of variation in male attractiveness and ornamentation have received much scrutiny, the causes and consequences of intraspecific variation in females have been relatively overlooked. Hemiclonal analysis of interacting phenotypes in male and female Drosophila melanogasterīackground Identifying the sources of variation in mating interactions between males and females is important because this variation influences the strength and/or the direction of sexual selection that populations experience. on behalf of The Society for the Study of Evolution. Evolution published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Examining mate choice in this dynamic context suggests that females evaluate the reliability of multiple sexual cues, taking into account environmental heterogeneity. Female mate choice for extended phenotype (male nests) was environmentally dependent ( females chose more compact nests in high DO conditions), while female choice for male phenotype was not ( females chose large, vigorous males regardless of DO level). Males in high DO environments built more compact nests than those in low DO conditions and males adjusted their nest structure in response to changing conditions. Then we recorded the mate choice of females encountering these males (and their nests), under either the same or reversed DO conditions. First, we manipulated the dissolved oxygen (DO) content of water to create high or low DO environments in which male fish built nests. Here, we test how environmental change mediates mate choice for multiple sexual traits, including an extended phenotype-the structure of male-built nests - in stickleback fish. However, the reliability of these cues may be dependent on stability of the environment, with heterogeneity affecting how selection acts on such traits. Sexual cues, including extended phenotypes, are expected to be reliable indicators of male genetic quality and/or provide information on parental quality. Head, Megan L Fox, Rebecca J Barber, Iain Environmental change mediates mate choice for an extended phenotype, but not for mate quality.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |